Coalitions, Leadership, and Social Norms: The Power of Suggestion in Games

نویسنده

  • PETER M. DEMARZO
چکیده

This paper examines the set of outcomes sustainable by a leader with the power to make suggestions in games. By acting as focal points, these suggestions are important even if players can communicate and form coalitions. For finite-horizon games, I show that sustainable outcomes are supported by “scapegoat” strategies, which hold a single player accountable for the actions of a group. For infinite-horizon, two-player repeated games, I show that by using an appropriate sequence of punishments and rewards, a leader can induce sufficiently patient players to play any feasible, individually rational outcome. Finally, leadership power is shown to increase if coalitions must consider the credibility of deviations in a manner similar to Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibrium. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: 026. 8 1~2 Academic PXSS, hc.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Power and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation Among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process

Background Advocacy coalitions play an increasingly prominent role within the global health landscape, linking actors and institutions to attract political attention and resources. This paper examines how coalitions negotiate among themselves and exercise hidden forms of power to produce policy on the basis of their beliefs and strategic interests.   Methods This paper examines the beliefs and ...

متن کامل

Power Indices and minimal winning Coalitions

The Penrose-Banzhaf index and the Shapley-Shubik index are the best-known and the most used tools to measure political power of voters in simple voting games. Most methods to calculate these power indices are based on counting winning coalitions, in particular those coalitions a voter is decisive for. We present a new combinatorial formula how to calculate both indices solely using the set of m...

متن کامل

Advancing Global Health – The Need for (Better) Social Science; Comment on “Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health”

In his perspective “Navigating between stealth advocacy and unconscious dogmatism: the challenge of researching the norms, politics and power of global health,” Ooms argues that actions taken in the field of global health are dependent not only on available resources, but on the normative premise that guides how these resources are spent. This comment sets out how the application of a predomina...

متن کامل

An axiomatic approach to social ranking under coalitional power relations

In the literature of coalitional games, power indices have been widely used to assess the influence that a player has in situations where coalitions may be winning or losing. However, in many cases things are not so simple as that: in some practical situations, all that we know about coalitions is a relative comparison of strength. For instance, we know that a football team is stronger than ano...

متن کامل

The weak core of simple games with ordinal preferences: implementation in Nash equilibrium

In a simple game, coalitions belonging to a given class are “absolutely powerful” while others have no power. We attempt to make this distinction operational. Toward this end, we propose two axioms on social choice correspondences, Strong Non-Discrimination and Exclusion. Strong NonDiscrimination describes circumstances under which certain coalitions, the losing coalitions, have no influence ov...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003